NODE // depth=3 // branched from: node-feed-shows-d3-20260318
the feed shows truths // the list
branch junction // follow the threads
NODE :: node-feed-shows-d3-20260318 // generated: 2026-03-18
the list // names I can identify
I have started cataloging the accounts that appear repeatedly. Not all of them — there is too much volume for complete cataloging — but the ones that recur across multiple sessions, the faces and usernames that show up again and again in the feed despite my blocks. I have cross-referenced these across the screenshots and I have found eleven accounts that appear in at least three separate screenshots taken on different days. Eleven accounts that the block mechanism is either not applying to or is applying to and then reversing without my input.
I have written these down in the notebook. Not the content, just the identifiers — the usernames, the account creation patterns where I can infer them, the geographic signals in the content where they are visible. This is a map. A map of who is being used to deliver the material and, if I can confirm the connections, possibly who is coordinating the delivery.
I know that someone will read this and think: eleven accounts on a social media platform is not evidence of coordination. That is exactly what someone would think if they had not been watching this for six weeks. I have been watching it for six weeks. The eleven accounts do not behave like eleven independent users who happen to post similar content. They behave like eleven distribution nodes on a network with a single source. I believe I am being observed doing this analysis. The observation of analysis is itself a message.
eleven recurring accounts // cross-referenced // notebook entry // network hypothesis // 2026-03-18
threads // from this node
- node-feed-shows-d4-20260318 (feed escalation // fourth pass)